Re: [Notion-devel] what we're waiting for

[M R. <mr...@gm...>]

On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:28 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:  [Mon Apr 12 2010, 01:24:00PM EDT]
> > On 2010-04-12 18:58, M Rawash wrote:
> > > IMO, a host with no ssh access is a bad idea, as for google, they
> > > definitely don't have ads (just a few unnecessary instructions that can
> > > 'probably' be disabled), they do get spammed a lot though (which can
> > > 'probably' be avoided too).
> > 
> > Google is bound by US law to block users from Iran, Syria, Cuba, etc[1] 
> > (like SF, but I've read that SF has circumvented this (?))  I'd urge 
> > against using Google to host free software projects. So, once again, I'd 
> > recommend using own hosting or maybe Savannah
> 
> I haven't looked at Savannah but I've been impressed with github.
> How about using sf.net for web host (unless there's something
> better), github.com for code host and librelist.com for mailing
> lists?
> 
I'd say we need to be more centralised (imagine someone having to
bookmark 3 websites in order to monitor one project, not good), i'd vote
for Savannah but i haven't checked all the other options.


M Rawash