From: Ole J. B. <ole...@ya...> - 2010-04-10 16:28:42
|
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:52:36 +0200, M Rawash <mr...@gm...> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 11:10 +0200, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On 2010-04-10 05:56, M Rawash wrote: >> > let's not forget the LGPL is itself copyrighted... >> >> Well, that's not *your* problem, that's something between FSF and >> Tuomo. It probably doesn't make the license invalid. >> > > so, what do you reckon we should do? > > > i suggest we find the latest ion3 release that didn't include Tuomo's > license and build on it from there (implementing all the later changes > with our own code and license it under GPL); but whatever we do, i'm not > in favour of keeping Tuomo's license (it's what drove people away in the > first place). > > regards, > M Rawash Patch descriptions of the post license changes: (40kB attachment limit?!) http://folk.ntnu.no/bronner/temp/post-license-changes.txt |