From: M R. <mr...@gm...> - 2010-04-10 13:59:41
|
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 11:10 +0200, Olof Johansson wrote: > On 2010-04-10 05:56, M Rawash wrote: > > let's not forget the LGPL is itself copyrighted... > > Well, that's not *your* problem, that's something between FSF and > Tuomo. It probably doesn't make the license invalid. > so, what do you reckon we should do? i suggest we find the latest ion3 release that didn't include Tuomo's license and build on it from there (implementing all the later changes with our own code and license it under GPL); but whatever we do, i'm not in favour of keeping Tuomo's license (it's what drove people away in the first place). regards, M Rawash |