From: Aron G. <agr...@n0...> - 2010-04-10 02:16:44
|
M Rawash wrote: [Fri Apr 09 2010, 07:35:03PM EDT] >> Agreed! (or some clarifications from Tuomo, but doesn't seem to be very responsive) > >I'd say screw it, let him sue, he doesn't have any legal grounds (saying >"section 'x' is void" does not automagically make it so) IANAL, but I think you might be wrong. It's his copyright and his license based on the LGPL. The LGPL holds no magical powers to force people to use it unmodified. If there's any question of legality, it would probably fall in his favor. Aron |