Re: [Notion-devel] the agenda

[Ole J. B. <ole...@ya...>]

>> Couple questions:
>> 1. Are we basing the fork on ion-3 stable, and not the development branch (ion-3plus)?
>> I'm not really sure how much differences there is, but are there reasons not to base it on the development branch? (ion-3plus seems quite stable to me)
>
> ion-3plus does not include libtu and libextl, which means they need to
> be compiled separately before you can compile notion. ion-3 resembles
> more what what notion should look like when it's released, and we can
> always add ion-3plus' changes later.

Well, I'd say it's easier (not any job at all really) to add libtu and libextl to ion-3plus than backporting the changes from ion-3plus later. (I guess that would involve more license complications too?)

>> 2. Do you have the darcs repo for the stable branch? (ion-3)
>
> all the ion3-related code is available here: http://github.com/gwash

But that doesn't contain the darcs repo? (_darcs folder) If we had the repo for both branches it would be easier to see the differences.

> we need a lawyer!

Agreed! (or some clarifications from Tuomo, but doesn't seem to be very responsive)

- Ole Jørgen Brønner