Re: [Notion-devel] the agenda

[Aron G. <agr...@n0...>]

[resend using the address I'd prefer on the list]

kevin granade wrote:  [Fri Apr 09 2010, 09:46:51AM EDT]
>The way forward I see for license compliance is this:
>1. We import the existing code into the repository.  (at this point we
>are compliant as we are distributing the code "as-is")
>2a. We go on a renaming spree, the extent of which is up to debate.
>(compliant as we still haven't violated any of the "special clauses")
>2b. (possibly in parallel with 2a) General inoffensive cleanup, "make
>it build" (still compliant with "special clauses")
>3. Once we have done all necessary renaming, etc... we can proceed
>with a clean conscience to making changes that Tuomo would object to,
>since we have met the alternative option in the "special clauses".

This would be my preferred approach. I would like to have a full
record of the rename in the repo.

Worst case: Tuomo doesn't like it and complains, and we rebuild
the repo to get rid of the initial revisions. I think it's an
acceptable risk because I don't personally think Tuomo is going
to go that far.

Aron