Re: [Notion-devel] the agenda

[Jeff M. <j...@co...>]

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 09:46, kevin granade <kev...@gm...> wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> The way forward I see for license compliance is this:
> 1. We import the existing code into the repository.  (at this point we
> are compliant as we are distributing the code "as-is")
> 2a. We go on a renaming spree, the extent of which is up to debate.
> (compliant as we still haven't violated any of the "special clauses")
> 2b. (possibly in parallel with 2a) General inoffensive cleanup, "make
> it build" (still compliant with "special clauses")

I agree completely with getting some kind of github/gitorious going,
and people (like me) who are experienced but don't have the time to
just do renaming alone, can start contributing, and submitting name
change after name change.  I don't think we'll be able to go forward
with a "notion" of a new ion if we don't first obey Tuomo's licensing.