Light explorer is far better than explorer that comes with the core; Why not include it?
It's faster
You can add/delete/rename etc.
It's got a good menu selection on right-click
It's favorites are better integrated
It includes network places
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I ditched Explorer for Explorer Lite. Both still have their shortcomings, but Lite is by far the better of the two at the moment, for all the reasons listed above and more. I'm not sure that 'filter file name' is a big deal - Windows Explorer doesn't have that (just a find dialog), but the increased speed, better UI and extra features are massively important. In fact, without Explorer Lite I would not now be using Notepad++...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Light explorer is far better than explorer that comes with the core; Why not include it?
It's faster
You can add/delete/rename etc.
It's got a good menu selection on right-click
It's favorites are better integrated
It includes network places
But it has no filter file name function.....
I ditched Explorer for Explorer Lite. Both still have their shortcomings, but Lite is by far the better of the two at the moment, for all the reasons listed above and more. I'm not sure that 'filter file name' is a big deal - Windows Explorer doesn't have that (just a find dialog), but the increased speed, better UI and extra features are massively important. In fact, without Explorer Lite I would not now be using Notepad++...