Re: [Nmock-general] FW: NMock, MSTest and Interface Implementation

[Steve F. <st...@m3...>]

Which begs the question, much as I dislike its syntax, as to whether  
we should all just use Rhino.

S

On 6 Aug 2007, at 14:16, Jim Arnold wrote:
> I would much rather see NMock 2 use a mature code-gen  
> implementation (such
> as Castle Proxy) which has already solved these problems.