Re: [Nfdump-discuss] Cisco 4500x netflow v9 and IPFIX gives bad timestamps in nfcapd
netflow collecting and processing tools
Brought to you by:
phaag
|
From: Peter H. <ph...@us...> - 2015-08-09 11:16:57
|
Hi Brian, CISCO changes every know and then a bit their way of sending/coding data .... It's not always easy to follow the trail. If you have 1.6.13 in use and still trouble, please send my me a long enough pcap ( including template as well as data records ) for checking. All data is treated confidentially of cource. Please send it to me directly, not to the list. Thanks - Peter On 04.08.15 15:15, Brian Epstein wrote: > Robert, Peter, > > Thanks for your help on this. My main problem is that the > Date/Timestamp is wrong. They are all showing up as 1969-12-31 > 19:00:00.000. Any idea on how to fix that? > > Thanks, > ep > > On 07/10/2015 09:57 AM, Brian Epstein wrote: >> Hi, > >> We've been using nfdump with nfsen for years. Thanks for >> supporting such a great product. > >> Recently, we've been trying to implement IPFIX with a couple of >> Cisco 4500X's and have been seeing an odd problem. The dumps come >> out with the wrong timestamp and INVALID as the event. > >> $ nfdump -r nfcapd.201507081630-sample Date first seen >> Event XEvent Proto Src IP Addr:Port Dst IP Addr:Port >> X-Src IP Addr:Port X-Dst IP Addr:Port In Byte Out Byte > >> 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000 INVALID Ignore TCP >> 157.55.39.187:32086 -> 172.16.52.154:80 0.0.0.0:0 >> -> 0.0.0.0:0 70 0 > >> 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000 INVALID Ignore TCP >> 172.16.48.51:62584 -> 172.16.19.20:443 0.0.0.0:0 >> -> 0.0.0.0:0 3168 0 > >> 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000 INVALID Ignore TCP >> 157.55.39.187:32086 -> 172.16.52.154:80 0.0.0.0:0 >> -> 0.0.0.0:0 5552 0 Summary: total flows: 3, total >> bytes: 8790, total packets: 106, avg bps: 0, avg pps: 0, avg bpp: >> 0 Time window: <unknown> Total flows processed: 3, Blocks skipped: >> 0, Bytes read: 312 Sys: 0.003s flows/second: 961.8 Wall: >> 0.000s flows/second: 5639.1 > >> I thought this might be due to the template not being sent enough, >> so I manually added the "template data timeout 30" to the flow >> exporter. This does show the template being sent every 30 seconds >> now in the packet captures, but the date/time and event is still >> incorrect. > >> Originally I was running 1.6.11 that comes with EL6, but then I >> compiled and installed 1.6.13 to see if it was fixed there. I'm >> still seeing the same behavior. > >> Attached is a packet capture with three packets. Two have a >> template, and one does not. Also, is an nfcapd file that shows >> some of those flows that were included in the packet capture. > >> Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help >> troubleshoot. > >> Thanks, Brian > > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > > > Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. >> GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support >> that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your >> business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. >> https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ > > > >> _______________________________________________ Nfdump-discuss >> mailing list Nfd...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Nfdump-discuss mailing list > Nfd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfdump-discuss > -- Be nice to your netflow data. Use NfSen and nfdump :) |