|
From: Pelle B. <pe...@ve...> - 2004-05-26 16:18:54
|
Good point. I will probably end up doing that. However Orion is good at handling frequent changes. I've got it up and running now on Orion. The whole way it handles deployments and redeployments I find a lot better. -P On Wednesday 26 May 2004 08:49, Anthony Schexnaildre wrote: > Why not just back down to Tomcat 4? Should be a much easier process and > much more stable. > > -Anthony > > On May 26, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Pelle Braendgaard wrote: > > We are running the demo server on a Virtual Server with Tomcat 5. I'ts > > been > > freezing, going down etc. > > > > I am going to try and install orion http://www.orionserver.com on it. > > Which is > > supposedly much more stable. > > -P > > -- > > http://talk.org + Live and direct from Panama > > http://neuclear.org + Clear it both ways with NeuClear > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle > > 10g. > > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Neuclear-develop mailing list > > Neu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/neuclear-develop -- http://talk.org + Live and direct from Panama http://neuclear.org + Clear it both ways with NeuClear |