RE: [Netstation-general] lpp
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
frank23
From: Miles R. <mr...@we...> - 2002-07-09 21:02:33
|
if you don't want supermount support its pretty easy, if you want super mount support then there is about 30ish patches you need to apply in a certain order to a base 2.4.18 kernel. you should be able to do this without to many hassles as long as you know how to compile a kernel. I can send you the required patches if you want, + a script which will apply them, but I've since worked out that I think it will either work or it won't, mandrake creates the boot method at installation time, I don't think it autodetects for the vesa type when booting, but at install (needs to be vesa 2), some modern computers we have don't even work with the lpp patch. so I don't really recommend it. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Van Eeckhoutte [mailto:ji...@va...] Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2002 06:31 To: net...@li...; Miles Roper Subject: RE: [Netstation-general] lpp You wouldnt happen to have a mini howto for this? ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Miles Roper" <mr...@we...> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:44:51 +1200 >Hi All, > >Well I got lpp working with a kernel image (including supermount). However, >doesn't seem to work on many machines, gives a error message about >unsupported display or something. I know mandrake Linux has a nice way of >either using a image overlay if it can, otherwise you see the text. I might >do some investigation about this, as I'm using the mandrake kernel anyhow >for supermount support. If you have any further ideas about this let me >know :o) > >Ideally, what I would like is lpp to work if it could, if it doesn't, then >just boot as normal. Ideas? > >Cheers > >Miles > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Whittaker [mailto:pa...@hy...] >Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2002 07:04 p.m. >To: Miles Roper >Cc: net...@li... >Subject: Re: [Netstation-general] lpp > > >> Just looking at lpp, how can we do this. I'm fine with applying the >patches >> etc... But in the install instructions it says to edit the lilo config >file >> and add in: >> >> vga=0x301 >> append="console=/dev/tty2 CONSOLE=/dev/tty2" >> >> We obviously aren't using lilo, I'm using mknbi (for the nbi image as >that's >> what I'm using). The append line is fine, you can do this with mknbi, >> however the vga line is a problem. >> >> Anyone have an idea how to do this? > >Despite what the doco says, LILO really has nothing to do with it - it's >a Linux kernel parameter. There are several ways you can set this: > >1) You can add the vga=0x301 to your mknbi --append string also (might >need to use vga=769 instead, there's a lot of unresolved FUD about >whether or not hexidecimal is accepted (I suspect it has been for >years)). > >2) You can use vidmode (or rdev -v) to tag the bzImage file with the >appropriate value (prior to running mknbi), ie. "rdev -v bzImage 769". > >3) You can use the DHCP 129 option to pass kernel arguments (including >vga=0x301) to the Etherboot ROM in the DHCP response, provided that >option 128 is also set to the binary string e4:45:74:68:00:00 >(hexidecimal). DHCP options 128 (byte array or string) and 129 (string) >are non-standard and must be user-defined; the way you define these >depends upon which DHCP implementation you are using. > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >No, I will not fix your computer. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf >_______________________________________________ >Netstation-general mailing list >Net...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netstation-general > |