Re: [Netnice-library] libnetnice tasks
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
taost6
From: Takashi O. <ta...@wi...> - 2005-11-19 12:58:25
|
hi Luke, and netnice-library developers, as you might have realized, i have sent you several emails this weekend, suggesting the task arrangement below. * libnetnice development * 1) specification all 2) prototyping Luke R on FreeBSD4.11 3) port FreeBSD5.4 Mark Linux Nishu OpenBSD - NetBSD - 4) application rewrite FreeBSD5.4 Mark H Van Tuyl Linux Kashif, Nirvail, Ashok, Gaurav OpenBSD - NetBSD - if you think the application rewriting is too easy, i may suggest other tasks; for example, improvement of the network control module for Apache web server, mod_netnice. btw, as i have suggested, it would be better for us to keep a english-version of the specification. so, i would appreciate if anybody put the result of machine-translation to the wiki page, as a starting point. lastly, if you want a team sticker, please let me know. but, please remember that a person is eligible for the sticker only after his first commit to the CVS, or to the Wiki ;-) thanks! -- taka Luke R wrote: > Hello all! I am looking to lead the development effort on libnetnice, and I was really happy to see that so many people are looking to get working on it as well. Don't let me hold anyone back - if someone has a really good idea on how this should happen, feel free to speak up and take the reigns. > > The first step I'm actually looking for is to get a solid definition of the interface and get it documented in the wiki on the site. I know that there are a few pages out there now, however all are in Japanese and did not translate very nicely for me via Google. If anyone has read through these pages and has a clear translation, please send it to the list. I realize some people aren't crazy about holding back on development - I know, I'm not really either. One thing I have learned in my minimal working experience though, is that it is a lot better to define things before you start coding. > > Next up will be the fun part of making this work, and then the various porting projects. If anyone working on a port wants to do this in parallel with the main libnetnice project, that will probably work out quite nicely. > > I guess that's what I had in mind for tackling this. If anyone think that sounds stupid or has other ideas, again, please say so. I'm really excited to get this in an easy-to-use library and extend Netnice into more applications. > > Luke R. |