From: Robert K. <r....@cr...> - 2007-09-10 11:04:23
|
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 11:54 +1200, Russell Fulton wrote: [snip] > WARNING: skipping "pg_opclass" --- only table or database owner can vacuum it > WARNING: skipping "pg_am" --- only table or database owner can vacuum it > WARNING: skipping "pg_amop" --- only table or database owner can vacuum it > > Clearly something isn't quite kosher with the Database ownership/acl.... These tables are all postgres internal ones, so the netdisco user isn't supposed to have the privs to vacuum them. However that does beg the question as to why it's trying in the first place. It should be possible to just vacuum the tables netdisco uses? -- Robert Kerr |