Re: [Netdisco] netdisco read-only server for pg9 hot standby

[<pe...@go...>]

to add a thought to Jeroen's good reply...

On 09/01/2011 07:27, Ben Carbery wrote:
> Can any of the devs confirm whether or not this is worth trying to
> do? If netdisco fundamentally relies on session information being in
> the database and this can't be easily changed, then I am thinking
> not.. 

My guess would be that if you enabled "Apache Auth" in Netdisco
config (and Apache-Netdisco config) then the users and session
tables would not be touched.

If you have a more public frontend then this could use Apache Auth
(as I used to do, with our org's single-sign-on and a "require user
..." or "require group ..." statement in Apache conf). It shouldn't
stop any other instance using a different auth mechanism.

Probably a good idea to disable the admin panel features altogether
in this case as well.

regards,
oliver.