[Netatalk-admins] Re: RH9 and CNID (still)

[Joe R. <li...@jo...>]

Just out of curriousity, have you updated RH 9 using up2date?

I'm putting together Erik Horn's observation about the glib libraries 
with what the BRU people told me about their product.  I was having 
some issues and they said, "You must have run the up2date or BRU 
wouldn't even run."  I guess it was something about the glibc libraries.

I know that RedHat back ported alot of the new threading from the 2.5 
kernel to their RH 9 / Kernel 2.4 setup.  I wonder if their earlier 
glib libs had some issues.  This would explain why, when someone 
re-compiled their own kernel, these issues seemed resolved.  Perhaps?

I know when RH 9 first came out, there were plenty of bugs regarding 
their new kernel threading and libraries.

Just a thought, since I'm running RH 9 and Netatalk 1.6.3/CNID with out 
a hitch or hiccup.  There just has to be something different between 
the two setups.

Cheers!
-Joe

On Friday, August 29, 2003, at 04:33  PM, Shawn Powers wrote:

> Well, no amount of Pepto Bismo can get me through the night, so I'm 
> currently
> downloading Redhat 8 to install on my server.  I'm encouraged because 
> it
> seems like folks have only had problem with redhat 9, and the only real
> reason I went with 9 is that it was the newest.
>
> Perhaps if this setup works well for me, I can get the developers to
> temporarily put a "not compatible with Redhat9" disclaimer on the 
> homepage or
> something until it's figured out.
>
> I'll let the list know how things go.
>
> -Shawn Powers
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Netatalk-admins mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netatalk-admins
>
>
Joe Rhodes Consulting LLC.
(608) 358.0503
www.joerhodes.com