From: Frank L. <fra...@go...> - 2010-04-20 17:47:06
|
2010/4/20 didier <dga...@ma...>: > Hi, > Le lundi 19 avril 2010 à 17:25 +0200, Frank Lahm a écrit : >> >> Thus I'll: >> >> - again wipe the current git tree >> >> - reimport current CVS, this time with every branch in there >> > >> > Here you go, this time with all cruft intact: >> > <http://netatalk.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=netatalk/netatalk;a=summary> >> > > Ok, looks great. ;) >> >>> What do we do for docs and test suite trees? >> >> >> >> Move to git too. >> > >> > I've already setup the repos and load them soon: >> > <http://netatalk.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb-index.cgi> >> >> Now they're all there (besided atalkconf which I'm thinking of moving >> to the main netatalk repro, possibly inside bin) >> >> Theoretically we could completely switch over now. > > Agree. As CVS is still a moving target, I suggest the following procedure for the switch: - release 2.1 next Monday On Tuesday: - freeze CVS - resync CVS to git - shutdown CVS - start using git >> copy of the current complete CVS data which I'd like to send to >> several people as tarball just in case (Didier, HAT, Andew) ... > > I already have a daily rsynced copy of sourceforge cvs tree. Ah, ok. In that case I'll save the bandwidth. ;) |