From: Frank L. <fra...@go...> - 2009-08-31 16:57:08
|
2009/8/31 Andrew Morgan <mo...@or...>: > On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Frank Lahm wrote: > >> As mentioned a few times I'd been working on a serverside utility >> which duplicate unix file utilities with AppleDouble support. >> >> Unfortunately I've got somehow stuck afer finishing `ls` with a long >> road still to walk. Meanwhile other stuff cropped up (replay cache) >> which I might be interested in implementing first. So I'm thinking of >> checking in my working ls tool so we could also release it with 2.1. >> I've used the followning naming scheme: `ad <unix utlility> ...`, eg. >> `ad ls ... `: >> >> Imo `ad ls` is nicer then `adls`. ad seems to be widely unused on most >> unix'es, some packages might use though but I couldn't find (goolge) >> any. >> ad stands for AppleDouble of course. >> >> Other suggestions ? > > "AD" commonly refers to Active Directory. I suppose that isn't a big deal > in this case. Would "adouble ls" be too much typing, or clash in some other > way? I'm very well prepared for this kind of argument: cp is cp and not copy. ;o) |