From: Thomas K. <Tho...@ph...> - 2008-03-07 22:04:23
|
Alex deVries wrote: > Based on our ability to test all of this, we may choose to drop > support for things that we can't test (eg. CAP volume migration). Dropping features IMO is only applicable if * you can either ensure that no netatalk user world-wide is using a feature any more * or it is in conflict with something else and weighing pros and cons leads to a clear decision: we decided for example to drop symlink support inside netatalk sharepoints to ensure compatiblity with AFP specs and semantics. Some users weren't happy with that decision but IMO it has been the _right_ decision because violation of AFP specs is nothing we should support Regards, Thomas |