Re: [Netatalk-admins] umask for directories in volume roo

[Didier <dga...@ma...>]

Hi,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:13:23 -0600, Steve Brown wrote
> > It would see that this is a "feature" of OS X 10.5.
> 
> Hmmm... you may be on to something here.  During some further work
> yesterday, I enabled the upriv option on the volume which cured my
> problems.  Once the option is enabled, directories are created as 
> they should from within Leopard.  However, this seems to imply a different
> default umask in Leopard than Tiger.  Here is what my tests have 
> found when creating a new directory (permissions on volume root are 
> drwxrwsrwx):
> 
> Tiger / no upriv: drwxrwsrwx
> Tiger / upriv on: drwxr-sr-x
> 
> Leopard / no upriv: drwx--S---
> Leopard / upriv on (no umask mod): drwxr-sr-x
> Leopard / upriv on (umask mod): drwxrwsr-x
> 
> The umask mod I refer to is this one:
> http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20061103144038651
> 
> If someone can point me to where I can d/l 2.1-dev, I will do some
> testing with that today and see what happens.
> 
cvs -d:pserver:ano...@ne...:/cvsroot/netatalk login

2.1-dev is HEAD ie:

cvs  -d:pserver:ano...@ne...:/cvsroot/netatalk -z3
co  -P netatalk

Or for not yet released netatalk-2.0.4 (perm option seems to be already check in) 

cvs  -d:pserver:ano...@ne...:/cvsroot/netatalk -z3
co -r branch-netatalk-2-0 -P netatalk

Note:
Sometime netatalk could be a little to clever with permissions.

If you can, try to capture the traffic with wireshark, AFP is fully decoded.
Look for FPSetDirParms calls. 
Didier