From: Romeyn P. <pr...@di...> - 2003-12-31 12:59:36
|
At 9:32 PM -0600 12/30/03, Ashok Aiyar scribbled: >On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Chris Woodfield wrote: > >> >> Sure you didn't mean "worst working Netatalk version"? "pre-alpha" >> typically means "buggy as hell"... > >I am going to second Thomas on this one. The cvs version works >remarkably well. When released, Bjoern and the other developers >will have a product that will give Helios a run for its money. > This is great, and I'm going to give this a whirl on a non-production (e.g. "non-critical") server. But I am (wisely, I think) reluctant to use pre-release software in a production environment! Is there a timetable for release of the "next version" of netatalk that will include AFP 3 support? We're going to be moving to OS X soon in our labs and I'm going to need that level of functionality. I'd RATHER use netatalk/linux than an OS X server or some other commercial solution! Cheers, ...ROMeyn -- signat-url: http://www2.potsdam.edu/prescor/signat-url.htm |