From: Wes H. <har...@us...> - 2001-04-12 01:09:40
|
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:21:16 +0100, Dave Shield <D.T...@cs...> said: Dave> So you'd envisage something along the lines of: Dave> snmp_lib_set_listener_flag( 1 ); Dave> snmp_init(); Dave> yes? Exactly, though it would likely be implemented using a default_store routine. Dave> I suppose the delayed initialisation could then be coded using: Dave> snmp_lib_set_listener_flag( 0 ); Dave> snmp_init( "" ); Dave> // blah, blah, blah Dave> snmp_init( "listener" ); Um, I would expect applications that were going to be a listener you'd know that early on. Anyway, I think we agree though the above example confuses me a bit again. I'm not sure that snmp_init() should ever be called twice... -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net...@li... |