[Net-snmp-patches] [ net-snmp-Patches-1521121 ] Full state machine for baby-steps flow.

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #1521121, was opened at 2006-07-12 11:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=1521121&group_id=12694

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Konstantin Abramenko (akonst)
Assigned to: Robert Story (rstory)
Summary: Full state machine for baby-steps flow.

Initial Comment:
I can suggest correct implementation of state machine
according with chart in baby_steps.c . 

Diff is made by SVN (our internal) from 5.3.0.1 release. 
I can make diff of my fixes from CVS top-of-tree. 

This fix made to allow ROW_CREATE mode and respective
callback, which will be called, if object_lookup return
error. 

If some MIB, using baby-step flow, does not provide
row_creation callback, it have to create new row for
SET operation in object_lookup callback, as it
currently generated by mib2c. 

New state machine works correctly with all current MIB
support modules and with advanced with row_creation
callback also. 

Respective changes in
local/mib2c-conf.d/mfd-interface.m2c are not cleaned to
be suggested as a patch. 

New field 'handlers' was added into structure
'netsnmp_baby_steps_access_methods' to eliminate
baby_state_multiplexer in future and call methods
directly by offset in structure. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2009-03-03 18:36

Message:
comment2, 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Konstantin Abramenko (akonst)
Date: 2006-07-12 12:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1149016

Try change attach once more.. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Konstantin Abramenko (akonst)
Date: 2006-07-12 12:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1149016

Ok, 
There was no significant commit, only some comments were
changed, and line numbers may shift.

diff for header is the same. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Anders (tanders)
Date: 2006-07-12 11:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=848638

Please (also) submit unified diff against CVS (MAIN or
V5-3-patches).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=312694&aid=1521121&group_id=12694