Re: informsink trapsink and trap2sink support for IPv6.

[Robert S. <rs...@fr...>]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:10:39 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF> > Given that this problem seems to appear in the 5.2.x line,
MF> > should the same fix be applied there too?  What about 5.1.x ?
MF> 
MF> As it is somewhat problematic (the issue of the lost additional port
MF> specifier) I think that it shouldn't be pushed to far, but 5.2 sounds safe.

I agree... applied to 5.2.x.

-- 
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.