Re: cerberus packet fragmentation

[Wes H. <har...@ti...>]

>>>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:36:33 -0500, Robert Story <rs...@fr...> said:

Robert> The other day I mentioned on IRC that I had fixed the large
Robert> packet problem by reassembling packet fragments before
Robert> encapsulating them, and refragmenting afterwards.  You
Robert> mentioned that this should be optional, as it involved
Robert> addition overhead.

Robert> Today I added a configure option to make reassembly
Robert> optional.

Ohh....  that's what you were talking about on irc.  Cool.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Network Associates Laboratories