Re: [Nebula-Discuss] Compilation woes

[Jack P. <ch...@gm...>]

I can't say about "fully compile and run", because I haven't tried to run
many of the Contributed modules, but the core Nebula2 and Mangalore projects
compile without problems for me (mviewer works). I use: Windows XP/Vista,
Visual C++ 2005, latest DX SDK, dependencies from the published on the
sourceforge archives (dated April 2007). You might want to check  the Nebula
forum, there are a couple of threads about compilation there.

2007/8/6, Laurie Harper <la...@ho...>:
>
> I've been trying to compile Nebula2 with varying degrees of success of
> different platforms. To what extent are the different build platforms /
> configurations currently maintained and/or supported?
>
> I started on Mac OS X, but found that the makefiles were pretty messed
> up. I fixed the worst of the problems in the makefile generation and,
> with a bit of tweaking and hacking, was able to make some progress, but
> the dependencies still seem incomplete; I get large numbers of undefined
> symbols at link time for virtually any library or executable. Not even
> nkernel links cleanly, needing symbols form ngfx, TinyXML and other
> modules that are not included (and don't look like they should be;
> surely nkernel shouldn't have a dependency on gfx2?) At any rate,
> scanning the archives, it doesn't look like anyone's worked with Nebula
> on OS X in some years, so I doubt I can expect much help on this platform.
>
> Next I tried on Linux (Mandriva Linux 2007.1). On that platform, the
> build chokes almost immediately with compilation errors. I suspect that
> the gcc/libc/whatever version is incompatible, but didn't investigate
> further yet.
>
> Finally, I gave Windows a try. After some pain getting Visual C++ 2007
> and the latest platform and DirectX SDKs installed I was able to get a
> fair bit compiled, but many of the workspaces still need manual
> dependency tweaks and other hackery. And quite a few just fail to
> compile or fail to link.
>
> Can anyone give me *specific* configurations (i.e. OS vendor/version,
> tool versions, library versions) that will fully compile and run? Is
> there somewhere better (e.g. one of the forums, a different mailing
> list) I should pursue help with build issues and/or porting to OS X?
>
> Thanks for any pointers,
>
> L.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
>
> *** NOTE: To reply to the list use "reply to all",  ***
> ***       to reply direct to the sender use "reply" ***
> _______________________________________________
> Nebuladevice-discuss mailing list
> Neb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nebuladevice-discuss
>