From: Kevin D. <kd...@op...> - 2004-06-22 15:47:36
|
I was, of course, intending to make it an 'optional extra' - We've just spent the last 6 months trying to ensure that the documentation matches the SDK ! I was only trying to ascertain whether people would find this concept useful. I haven't written any code yet, I just dummied-up the screen shot as an example. I have also been considering "R" for Read-Only fields and properties with only a getter... Kevin I agree with Heath. At ILOG, we try to be as consistent as possible with .NET Framework SDK. ============================= Claire CHARDINY Product Information Tools, ILOG cch...@il... Looks okay, but I recommend making these optional icons. For consistency, some developers/organizations may want to stay with just "S" and not to remain consistent with the .NET Framework SDK (in whatever collection it may be found). --- Heath Stewart, Microsoft MVP Director of Technology Proplanner http://www.proplanner.com |