Re: [Ndiswrapper-general] Re: Regressions with FC3 and BCM4306

[Giridhar P. <pg...@ya...>]

--- Adrian Irving-Beer <wis...@wi...> wrote:

> > You've got the source RPM, not the binary RPMs.
> 
> Oh, but of course, you at least need the kernel
> headers to compile,
> not just a binary image.
> 

I thought it was obvious that I wanted kernel sources,
not the binary, so that I can compile kernel on my own
selecting/deselecting options. Debian's alien can
easily handle binary rpm. As I said, the problem was
applying the patches in kernel source rpm. Anyway, I
wrote a script to handle that and now compiling fedora
kernel-2.6.10-1.760_FC3.src.rpm kernel.

BTW, I noticed that after applying all the patches and
doing 'make menuconfig', I see the option to select
4k/8k stacks. Did fedora start including this option
recently? It looks like I applied all the patches that
.spec file says. I didn't use .config that .spec file
says, though. Fedora users may want to look into 4k/8k
stack option with 760 rpm.

Giri


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250