From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2007-10-09 13:49:02
|
On 10/9/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <zv...@ar...> wrote: > > On 09.10.2007, at 15:07, Stephen Deasey wrote: > > > > > 32-bit only -- is this a good assumption? > > No. But I found only Solaris 2.8 missing them. Solaris 2.8 is 32-bit only? This will fail silently and someone will be surprised... |