From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2007-07-03 21:29:04
|
On 7/3/07, Zoran Vasiljevic <zv...@ar...> wrote: > > On 03.07.2007, at 23:07, Stephen Deasey wrote: > > > > > Is autoconf-2.60 too painful? > > > Did you try to compile Tcl with that (2.60)? > I do not know about Darwin and 2.60 autoconf. > I maybe needing to test that. Only applies if you build Tcl from CVS, right? You can usually install multiple versions of autoconf at the same time. Fedora has autoconf (2.61) and autoconf213 (2.13) available by default. > At the moment I can live with commenting > those out (just did and it passed). So they're at least present on OSX. If they're available on everything we care about there's no point testing... |