From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2006-10-07 17:02:26
|
We can. It's not that big of a change. I was just generally holding off on adding new things to the driver because there's a lot of code in there now and it's getting hard to manage. On 10/7/06, Vlad Seryakov <vl...@cr...> wrote: > Stephen, > > i checked your patch for AS 4.1 regarding acceptmax, we can adopt it > for our driver as well > > > > No, nothing bad. I think it's a great idea! > > > > But some of the newer APIs for this are weird because they handle more > > than socket IO, and we are worried about portability, right? I'm just > > saying that to get high-performance they may not be strictly > > necessary. So, if it proves difficult to port to Windows or OSX... > > doesn't neccessarily matter, they're not going to suffer. > > > > But yeah, we should definately move in this direction. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > > naviserver-devel mailing list > > nav...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > nav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel > |