From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2006-09-20 19:42:18
|
On 20.09.2006, at 21:36, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > In out simplest case no benefits because out repository structure does > not change often. It is just more modern source control thing, but we > can stay on CVS. OK. More (or less) modern, I do not care. It has to do the job and be reasonably simple to use, which cvs is. I would say: if ain't broken, don't fix it. We have enough "construction sites" to take care of, which are more important. |