From: Vlad S. <vl...@cr...> - 2006-09-14 20:31:02
|
yes,per pool is safer Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > On 14.09.2006, at 22:13, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > >> New command will be better and more clear > > OK. > > ns_proxy stop ?pool? ?handle? > > The [ns_proxy stop] will stop all running proxies (brrr.. ) > and [ns_proxy stop pool] only those belonging to a pool > and [ns_proxy stop pool handle] only that particular handle. > > I somehow have bad feeling abut [ns_proxy stop] as it is > really far-reaching. Should we limit this to > > ns_proxy stop pool ?handle? > > What do you think? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > nav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel > -- Vlad Seryakov 571 262-8608 office vl...@cr... http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/ |