From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2006-09-14 19:59:52
|
On 9/13/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <zv...@ar...> wrote: > > On 13.09.2006, at 04:55, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > > > Had ns_proxy running, typed in nscp ns_shutdown and nsd crahsed > > Eh... this is true. In the attempt to cleanup as much as possible > I prematurely cleaned a pool having references to it. > Actually, pools still having references to them should not be > touched and should rather leak. > OTOH, at the shutdown, there should be no references as all > threads should have already been exited. I guess at this point > we have still some trouble... > > The immediate and not clean solution is just to skip such pools > and let them leak. I'm emitting the log message in such case as > the reminder: > > [13/Sep/2006:10:22:37][1132.2684415384][-main-] Warning: nsproxy: > pool "test" not destroyed, has 1 active slaves > > I do not think it is possible to avoid this, after thinking about > this for a while. But still, lets leave this here as we might be > more clever in the future. > Currently you're cleaning up with a AtExit handler and manually calculating a timeout to wait for proxies to exit. I think you really want an AtShutdown callback. These already handle a notification and then timeout sequence. I think at the moment a clean exit will take shutdown-timeout + proxy-shutdown-timeout, which might be surprising to people. |