From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2006-08-29 20:43:25
|
On 29.08.2006, at 22:29, Stephen Deasey wrote: > It would be more flexible to create ns_*ctl commands and put them > *lower* in the stack, and then build a dynamic configuration tool on > top of this, than to bake a dynamic configuration mechanism into the > server, and have code depend on that. Yet, if module A changes value B, how would that look like if I'd need to have it arround the next boot time? IOW, how would you handle persistence with that? |