From: Michael L. <mic...@gm...> - 2006-08-14 17:11:25
|
> Is this really so? I mean, I would expect the [ns_return] > to ignore any optional encoding stuff and delegate all > to [ns_conn] in the similar way how you use channels in Tcl. Encoding set via [ns_conn] is only respected by [ns_return] if no OutputCharset is defined and no charset is defined with the type-argument of [ns_return]. > After all, you do not [puts] with an encoding. You just [puts] > and the [fconfigure channel -encoding] sets the channel to the > desired encoding. > I mean, If I wrote that, I'd do it so. I'd do it like this, too. And in fact this is why I was so confused about [ns_conn encoding]. > You will have to give me some hints on how you use all > those commands. We don't use them at the moment. We set the encoding(s) in the config and with [ns_return]. Bernd asked me to write encoding-tests and thats why I stumbled over the [ns_conn] command. |