From: Gustaf N. <ne...@wu...> - 2006-08-14 16:44:14
|
Zoran Vasiljevic schrieb: > On 08.08.2006, at 11:48, Michael Lex wrote: > >> When no OutpuCharset is defined, naviserver will send the content >> without transformation, that means utf-8. But according to the RFC >> 2616 (HTTP 1.1) all content without an explicit "charset: ..." in the >> Content-Type-Header should be treated as iso-8859-1 by the clients. >> This causes problems when you have an incomplete configuration (w/o >> OutputCharset). >> > > Heh... should we simply add the UTF8 charset declaration > in absence of the output encoding? I believe this would > be the simplest "fix"? > at least for the tests, when no OutputCharset other than UTF-8 is specified. ...and none of its derivations, such as diacritical enconding on macs. i would think that the added charset declaration on a mac must be different. recoding utf-8 can affect the number of bytes as well. -gustaf PS: yes, the added signature is strange. |