From: Gustaf N. <ne...@wu...> - 2006-07-01 16:17:50
|
Zoran Vasiljevic schrieb: > For my *personal* taste, the API is way too large > but what I do not use, I do not care for. > I have nothing against having all this in core > and I have nothing against maintaining this > code in future, if the need arises. > > The ns_cache interface resembles much similarity to the nsv interface. Essentially, it looks to me as an outsider that the main difference to nsv are the options for pool size and timeout. Has anyone considered to converge nsv and ns_cache by e.g. providing storage pools with size and timeout to nsv (binding nsv varnames to storage pools)? Also, the eval subcommand makes sense for nsv. -gustaf |