From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2006-06-27 16:52:24
|
On 6/27/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <zv...@ar...> wrote: > > Am 27.06.2006 um 18:15 schrieb Stephen Deasey: > > > > > There's no default timeout in the current code, and the error > > message should be: > > > > timeout waiting for concurent update: ... > > > > Make sure you're testing code from HEAD. > > Easier said than done. The HEAD is not usable for testing > as the code we have on the customer site is dated prior to > your recent changes to ns_cache. Hence I must look in the > code before that and try to understand if there is still > something wrong OR the timeout of 3 seconds is just to low. > > We will have to maintain a separate internal branch until > all this noise on ns_cache settles down and we are again > all confident that it works as wanted/expected. Recent > changes made it incompatible with the rest of the code and > we can't make changes there for some time. > OK. Just checking. |