From: Stephen D. <sd...@gm...> - 2006-06-27 16:15:03
|
On 6/27/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <zv...@ar...> wrote: > > Am 27.06.2006 um 13:33 schrieb Zoran Vasiljevic: > > > Hi ! > > > > I got the same report from customers: > > > > timeout waiting for update: 59331.0.n.childs > > > > We never use anything except ns_cache_create, ns_cache_flush > > and ns_cache_eval commands. > > This might be if the default value of cacheTimeout of 3 seconds > is simply too low for the operation of caching the element in > ns_cache_eval. I believe that this default value is too low. > I have instructed the customer to increase the value from 3 to > 60 secnds and observe the operation. At the same time I'm analyzing > the code once more... Soon I will know everything by heart.. There's no default timeout in the current code, and the error message should be: timeout waiting for concurent update: ... Make sure you're testing code from HEAD. |