From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2006-06-20 16:43:03
|
Am 20.06.2006 um 16:21 schrieb Vlad Seryakov: > On the other > hand, as we talked a year ago, whoever introduces a feature and nobody > object in the reasonable time(i remember we agreed on 1 week) feature > remains in the code until something new/better comes up but that will > need discussion why to remove it because somebody may use it already > once introduced. We all added a lot of things that everyone of us need > and that was one of the reasons of this fork, we needed features > and we > added them. Allight! Well, you objected immediately... Lets see what Stephen can add to that. I yet have to digest the change but will definitely object if I'm not able to give alternate timeouts for different caches. Also, I'd keep the cache API as simple as possible. > > As for CVS HEAD using in the production, i am comfortable with it and > that is the reason i am adding new things, i have it running on > pre-production first, and once the feature stable and working it moves > to production, because i needed it in the production in the first > place > so i added it. Good. So there is no so big harm at the moment for you. For ourselves, we must go and get this stabilized at some point as I'm planning to get our 2.3 release out and for that I need stable nscache and nsproxy. Cheers Zoran |