Re: ns_tls? Was: [naviserver-devel] Re: [naviserver-commits] naviserver/nsd tclcache.c,1.2,1.3 tclcmds.c,1.34,1.35

[Vlad S. <vl...@cr...>]

Not you exactly but both of you and Stephen:-)))

Global Tcl vars is more cleaner Tcl-only solution but i agree 
interoperability between C and Tcl using ns-tls would be a good feature.
Internally ns_tls keeps Ns_set, so getting this from C would be just 
gettting pointer to Ns_Set structure. It just requires more C-level 
calls something like Ns_GetTclTls()/Ns_SetTclTcls()

Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> 
> On 18.04.2006, at 15:52, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
> 
>> You convinced me that at this moment ns_tls is not appropriate, i will 
>> remove it
> 
> Oh?! How did I do that? Apart from giving a trivial
> alternative, I think that this interface is ok per-se.
> It allows "unified" access from Tcl and C code.
> That is, one should be able to do the "same" from C
> and Tcl. Isn't it so?
> 
> Cheers
> Zoran
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> naviserver-devel mailing list
> nav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
> 

-- 
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
vl...@cr...
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/