Re: [naviserver-devel] Interesting...

[Andrew P. <at...@pi...>]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:14:14PM +0100, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:

> For us: bottom line is: we will stay with ns_malloc as-is as the
> speed penalty vs. malloc on Solaris/Mac 1cpu is not worth the
> effort.

If anyone is really interested in this, the best thing to do would be
to try various more sophisticated high-performance multi-threaded
malloc replacements, rather than just ns_malloc.  This was discussed a
bit on the AOLserver list a year or three ago, if anyone cares to
search.

-- 
Andrew Piskorski <at...@pi...>
http://www.piskorski.com/