Re: [naviserver-devel] Interesting...

[Vlad S. <vl...@cr...>]

I modified memtest to exclude thread related timings.

It is at the http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/tmp/memtest.c

when i call it with memtest 100000 and +, mallocs gettting faster than 
Tcl alloc on my single CPU box


Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> 
> Am 02.02.2006 um 13:59 schrieb Andrew Piskorski:
> 
>>
>> Zoran, the boxes where you're tests show unexpectedly slow ns_malloc
>> were all Mac PowerPC boxes running OS-X, is that right?  If so, then
>> the common thread here is OS-X, no?  OS-X is known to be significantly
>> less efficient than Linux in some areas, this is probably one of them?
>>
> 
> Oh no...
> 
> I had tested Linux and Solaris boxes as well.
> I have 2 Solaris boxes: one with 1 cpu and one with 2 cpu's.
> The same goes for Mac OSX.
> Unfortunaltey, I have only 1cpu linux boxes to test...
> 
> What I saw is: 1cpu malloc better than ckalloc
>                2cpu ckalloc better than malloc
> 
> regardless which OS.
> 
> Cheers
> Zoran
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log 
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> naviserver-devel mailing list
> nav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
> 

-- 
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
vl...@cr...
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/