Re: [naviserver-devel] Interesting...

[Vlad S. <vl...@cr...>]

I tried on single CPU box 3.2Ghz with 1Gb of RAM, on 2CPU box i got the 
same result, ns_malloc is fatser

Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> 
> Am 01.02.2006 um 17:15 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
> 
>> On my machine with tcl 8.4.12
>>
>> starting 10 malloc threads...waiting....done:  0 seconds, 16003 usec
>> starting 10 ns_malloc threads...waiting....done:  0 seconds, 13207  usec
> 
> 
> I've been trying to see why I'm getting worse values with ns_malloc
> as with malloc and it turned out to be that only in 2+CPU box I was
> able to get ns_malloc outperform the malloc. On all single-cpu boxes
> the times were 2 up to 4 times better with plain malloc!
> 
> Does anybody have a single AND multi-cpu box to try out?
> 
> Cheers
> Zoran
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log 
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> naviserver-devel mailing list
> nav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
> 

-- 
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
vl...@cr...
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/