From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2005-10-22 13:12:09
|
Am 21.10.2005 um 15:19 schrieb Vlad Seryakov: > Looks okay, API has changed but if we accept it, i suppose onetime > code change is acceptable > What about timed cache? I miss this (for us) important feature. Why passing the cacheTable over ClientData? Why not creating caches during server lifetime instead of only at startup? I guess answer to all of those is: this is a work in progress :-) Well, I just wanted to put those on the table so we know what is still left to do? What I miss: what is the main benefit of nscache2/cache2 over the existing nsache/cache? Zoran |