From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2005-10-21 05:50:35
|
Am 21.10.2005 um 07:42 schrieb Stephen Deasey: > > Not sure about LIFO for shutdown callbacks though. Does it make > sense? It's one extra thing to remember... > Well, I was thinking about that ... The fact is, it run as that before so I left it. OTOH, if you do A->B->C and start it is logical to do C->B->A at stop. Therefore I left the inverse order of stop scripts. If this proves problematic, it can be changed simply by flipping one argument to RunCallbacks. Zoran |