From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2005-07-04 06:21:28
|
Am 03.07.2005 um 12:27 schrieb Stephen Deasey: > > I'm wondering if the best way forward is to back out the range code, > make a quick release, then add it back for the next one along with the > TclVFS stuff, file upload improvements, and hopefully my mythical > caching changes, all of which are pretty invasive and potentially > destabilizing. What does everyone think? Apropos a quick tagged release, yes! As I see, Vlad is somehow dependent on the range's implementation and I would not like to make his life complicated by taking out the pieces. Perhaps a temporary #ifdef USE_BYTE_RANGES which would be per-default undefined? This way he can just simply fix the Makefile. I'm also using this with URLDECODE_RELAXED to be compatible with (broken) urldecoder on AS... Zoran |