From: Zoran V. <zv...@ar...> - 2005-06-17 06:37:27
|
Am 17.06.2005 um 07:29 schrieb Stephen Deasey: > > Hope I didn't confuse the issue here, but Vlad seemed worried about > having connection threads tied up handling blocking IO. We have some > good options: adjust the readahead buffer, upto maxinput if needed, > and use connection thread pools to partition resource intensive URLs. > This is acceptable for me. I would not go into the extent of adding yet another layer of processing just to save conn threads from blocking. I believe the thread-pool of conn threads dealing large uploads is perfectly OK to start with. If this ever becomes a problem for somebody we could add intermediate socket spooler threads. And the implementation also does not seem to be a rocket science. I'm all for this. Zoran |