From: Vlad S. <vl...@cr...> - 2005-03-16 23:05:40
|
It looks pretty simple, but having syslog as a module will result that for watcher and other system things there will be static version in the core. And usually, this is just one function, either in Windows or Linux. http://www.byte.com/art/9604/sec15/art3.htm Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > Hi! > > Vlad suggested in the RFE #1156875 (Watchdog process restarts failed server) > to include the interface to Unix syslog facility. > > I'm actually very interested to get a kind-of abstraction > (if possible) which would allow us to be more platform > independent in terms of being able to send logs to the > windows server log as well. I'm not that familiar with > the windows platform but I have a collegue who is. > > The task would be to abstract both and wrap them > in a module, not necessarily the server itself. > The same way the nslog is done. In this case it > would be kindof nssyslog or similar. > > I will try to see with my collegue how those two > different logging systems could be abstracted > and wether this is possible at all. > > Do you guys have any experience on that? > > Cheers > Zoran > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > naviserver-devel mailing list > nav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel -- Vlad Seryakov 571 262-8608 office vl...@cr... http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/ |